Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JF's avatar

You’re not even mentioning how these numbers are being juiced by aggregating simulcasts. It’s quite notable with the NBA on Christmas Day where 1.7 of the 5 million people were watching on ESPN. It’s a little conspicuous that the ESPN altcast was getting 50% of the viewers the ‘main’ broadcast on network TV with the supposed best announcing team in the business. Then consider the opportunity cost, a wins-above-replacement metric, to understand how these broadcasts are gaining the marginal viewer. Judging from the ratings of meaningless Bowl games. you throw anything on ESPN around that time and it will rate >750K viewers. So, to play the hypothetical, what would have the NBA’s most watched game rated had it been broadcast exclusively on ABC as they had in the past? 4.5m? 4.25M? Same goes for the IST knockout games which benefited from the same tactic.

Expand full comment
Nate's avatar

I spent Christmas with a group of normie sports fans. At one point the topic of athletes flopping/diving/etc came up, and someone immediately said "Ugh, the NBA guys are THE WORST with that." The whole room agreed, spent a few minutes shitting on the NBA for that, and then proceeded to watch football for 10 hours. And even though I'm a bigger NBA fan than all of them, I couldn't argue their point, because they're right.

It boggles my mind that Silver doesn't realize this foul-baiting nonsense hurts the league.

Expand full comment
29 more comments...

No posts