Discussion about this post

User's avatar
you'rebeingfollowed's avatar

Terrific article, Ethan. This is what makes you unique in NBA circles- willing to say what you know, with honesty, without a desire to harm, but to let the truth be known. Here is the question that I have: Why do teams need Shams and Woj? If they were trading scoops for positive coverage, wouldn't that be far more effective with the local writers (since covering those teams isn't Shams and Woj's main job)? Couldn't the team go out what it wants to just as efficiently through Slater/McMenamin/McMahon/et al? Why do GM's/powerful execs need the newsbreakers? Is it a quid pro quo (where Shams/Woj are leaking crumbs to them on what other teams are doing)? That would make the most sense to me. If so, **that's** a huge story. But it would never come to light because it would harm both of the parties that could verify. I could only see it if one of the power players got toppled and then had nothing to lose by sharing (ala Tim Donaghy).

Expand full comment
SilverballManiac's avatar

The only reason I would care is if the implication is that Shams wanted the Bulls to be penalized, for hiring an exec that favors Woz over him. THAT would be interesting. The rest is all self flagellation (by the news breakers, not you Ethan).

You correctly allude to the fact that no one should give a flying fig who breaks news first. But that’s simply another example of how shallow and superficial our society - and many of its people - really is. People should choose their media sources carefully, based on the quality and integrity of the product. Not based on who’s first.

But whatever.

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts