Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Larry Quantz's avatar

Very important column from Ethan that outlines A) the sports leagues want you to *lose* at gambling and the casinos help enforce that, and B) they don't care if you do lose, the more the better in fact.

Are you going to read this at espn.com?? Or The Athletic for that matter?

I'm opposed to sports gambling aside from office superbowl or NCAA $5 brackets because of the ruin it brings to far too many people. That, plus we're guaranteed a Black Sox sized scandal at some point with the gambling money rolling in right now. Some NBA sixth man, looking to make a little side $$ near the end of his career will tank some shots, or an NFL kicker on the way out who figures what the heck, time to shank while I can, are likely candidates for first dibs. Established superstars with gambling problems are next in line, and then we'll see if the NFL and NBA think it was all worth it.

Expand full comment
David Belshaw's avatar

Great piece Ethan. As a UK resident, I’ve always found the relentlessness of ringer/athletic gambling coverage a little mad given their progressive branding.

We have 450 000 kids gambling every week and around 450 suicides per year attributed to gambling addiction. It is every where and largely resented as a parasitical influence. Gambling addiction is no joke and the increasing number of triggers is worrying. Plus the constant ads and betting chat is really dull for non gamblers.

Expand full comment
42 more comments...

No posts